Welcome to Environmental Pollution Guide
Environmental Science And Pollution Article
. For a permanent link to this article, or to bookmark it for further reading, click here.
Information On Environmental Pollution: Does Greenpeace Deliver?
from:Solid information on environmental pollution can be difficult to find. For one, good information on environmental pollution is frequently too technical to be of any use to anyone outside of the academy, or anyone not planning on devoting their life to understanding all of the technical issues and chemical factors that make up the environment and our relation to it as human beings. For another, good information on environmental pollution is also frequently too local in its focus to be of any use to anyone not from that area. Sure, it may be interesting that desert caves in Libya are experiencing accelerated erosion as a result of magnesium deposits in nearby oases. But what does that have to do with us?
Yet it's a given that we need good information on environmental pollution in order to live in the modern world. The war to protect the environment is everyone's war; the environment itself is everyone's battleground. Greenpeace, despite the name, is one of the organizations that uses military metaphors as a central piece of their public relations strategy. Greenpeace positions themselves as a group of "Rainbow Warriors", dedicated to protecting the planet from its oppressors at any costs. And through their media and public outreach wings, Greenpeace positions itself as a solid source of information on environmental pollution.
But is this really the case? Is Greenpeace solely motivated by the need to deliver solid information on environmental pollution to the public at large? Or does it have another agenda--one which would lead it to distort even the facts it has sworn to protect?
Since its inception Greenpeace has been a political entity. The organization came to prominence by protesting nuclear weapons testing in Alaska--surely a political issue if there ever was one. Once the group became seaborne with the purchase of their famous flagship, the "Rainbow Warrior", they quickly became infamous in Japanese whaling circles for their deliberate interference in whaling options--an act that led to their branding as "eco-terrorists" by the Japanese government.
None of this in and of itself would make Greenpeace's information suspicious: after all, many organizations have done worse and still provided reliable information to the public. But in a recent article that appeared in the Wall Street Journal, Patrick Moore, one of the co-founders of Greenpeace spoke out against increasing politicization within the Greenpeace movement, taking as his evidence their 1986 campaign against chlorine use, and their ongoing campaign against phthalate compounds used in children's toys. According to Moore, both chemicals are perfectly safe, and are being used by Greenpeace as "hot button" issues to alarm people--and to drum up political capital for Greenpeace.
There's no immediate reason to trust Mr. Moore over his former partners, of course--which is the problem. In the politics of environmentalism, it's difficult to know who to trust--and the arcane scientific journals may be the only source of rock-solid information on environmental pollution we have, even if it remains a bitter and hard-to-swallow drink.
Environmental Science And Pollution Specific links
Environmental Science And Pollution News
Wareham River on Buzzards Bay Coalition nitrogen pollution study list
Officials from the Buzzards Bay Coalition, UMass Dartmouth and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) announced that they have signed an agreement that will ensure that Final Nitrogen Pollution Threshold Reports for five critical embayments in Dartmouth, New Bedford, Fairhaven and Wareham will be delivered within the next year.
Read more...An Inside Look at EPA’s Carbon Pollution Hearings
By Mandy Warner It was an exciting day for clean energy at the downtown Washington, D.C. headquarters of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). That’s where EPA held one of its two public hearings on the first ever proposed carbon pollution standards for new power plants. (The other hearing was in Chicago). EPA’s registered speaker list was jam-packed. In fact, they had to run the hearings ...
Read more...Envirothon competitors seek pollution solutions
High school students from 62 counties are taking part in the 29th annual Pennsylvania State Envirothon at Pitt-Johnstown and competing for recognition and scholarships by demonstrating their knowledge of environmental science and natural resource management.
Read more...Beetles Contribute To Air Pollution In Forests
Brett Smith for RedOrbit.com Activity of the bark beetle is having an impact on both air quality and climate, according to a new report from a team of American scientists published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology . Evidence of the beetle’s impact can be seen in the lodgepole pine forests of the western United States. Many of the trees there are dying or ravaged by the beetles ...
Read more...Meet the Science in Action Finalists
Who will win the first $50,000 Science in Action prize, sponsored by Scientific American ? This award, offered as part of the 2012 Google Science Fair, will recognize a student project that addresses a social, environmental, ethical, health or welfare issue to make a practical difference to the lives of a group or community, and that could possibly be scaled. In addition to the cash prize, the ...
Read more...